Comments for Lance's Ramblings http://blog.ramereth.net Where ever you go, there you are Mon, 12 May 2008 16:25:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 Comment on A new look for viewcvs by Donnie Berkholz http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/10/18/a-new-look-for-viewcvs/#comment-313 Donnie Berkholz Thu, 16 Mar 2006 18:42:25 +0000 http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/10/18/a-new-look-for-viewcvs/#comment-313 "per se" dammit! Don't make me beat you up. “per se” dammit! Don’t make me beat you up.

]]> Comment on A new look for viewcvs by ramereth http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/10/18/a-new-look-for-viewcvs/#comment-173 ramereth Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:54:44 +0000 http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/10/18/a-new-look-for-viewcvs/#comment-173 Nope, believe me.. I tried and it simply will not work at a root level like that. I can get it to work as /viewcvs/ but not simply as /. I'd need to bug upstream to figure out why I can't get it to work properly. Everytime I'd try, it'd just totally break something. I even posted the question on their mailing list without any reply :(. Anyways, thanks for the comment! Nope, believe me.. I tried and it simply will not work at a root level like that. I can get it to work as /viewcvs/ but not simply as /. I’d need to bug upstream to figure out why I can’t get it to work properly. Everytime I’d try, it’d just totally break something. I even posted the question on their mailing list without any reply :(.

Anyways, thanks for the comment!

]]> Comment on A new look for viewcvs by lisa http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/10/18/a-new-look-for-viewcvs/#comment-172 lisa Sat, 22 Oct 2005 23:43:14 +0000 http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/10/18/a-new-look-for-viewcvs/#comment-172 No mod_rewrite to remove the viewcvs.py? Frankly I think it looks pretty darn good! No mod_rewrite to remove the viewcvs.py?

Frankly I think it looks pretty darn good!

]]> Comment on www node refresh by ciaranm http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/05/24/www-node-refresh/#comment-32 ciaranm Wed, 25 May 2005 07:59:12 +0000 http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/05/24/www-node-refresh/#comment-32 Yay! Yay!

]]> Comment on Virus Mails Galore! by Mark http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/05/04/virus-mails-galore/#comment-17 Mark Fri, 06 May 2005 14:51:46 +0000 http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/05/04/virus-mails-galore/#comment-17 Clamav is great, but is a huge resource hog. I highly recommend a distributed setup like Inbound Mail ^ |-> smtp spooler/clamav/spam assassin | | | |------------------------------> IMAP+SSL/mailboxes | | |-> smtp spooler/clamav/spam assassin Clamav is great, but is a huge resource hog. I highly recommend a distributed setup like

Inbound Mail
^
|-> smtp spooler/clamav/spam assassin
| |
| |——————————> IMAP+SSL/mailboxes
| |
|-> smtp spooler/clamav/spam assassin

]]> Comment on Virus Mails Galore! by ramereth http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/05/04/virus-mails-galore/#comment-16 ramereth Wed, 04 May 2005 15:21:05 +0000 http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/05/04/virus-mails-galore/#comment-16 We're going to leave this optional as much as we can so you can use procmail to say what you want to do with it. I really haven't had much experience with clamav yet, but a few of our infra dudes have so we'll probably try something simliar to your approach. We’re going to leave this optional as much as we can so you can use procmail to say what you want to do with it. I really haven’t had much experience with clamav yet, but a few of our infra dudes have so we’ll probably try something simliar to your approach.

]]> Comment on Virus Mails Galore! by slarti http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/05/04/virus-mails-galore/#comment-15 slarti Wed, 04 May 2005 15:18:47 +0000 http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/05/04/virus-mails-galore/#comment-15 ClamAV provides a daemon, similar to SpamAssassin's spamd, that should reduce system load a *little*. I haven't done any serious tests, but I should guess that just checksumming attached files against a list of viruses is going to be a lot less intensive than, say, the bayesian analysis of SpamAssassin. Also, how would you set this up? Done before delivery to mailboxes, or leave it up to the users and let them set it up in their procmailrc or similar? mail-filter/clamassassin has a USE flag for using clamd that would be perfect for the latter. It provides a spamassassin-like interface for clamav. It's possible to call clamdscan from procmailrc and use it that way, but it's a bit of a pain. ClamAV provides a daemon, similar to SpamAssassin’s spamd, that should reduce system load a *little*. I haven’t done any serious tests, but I should guess that just checksumming attached files against a list of viruses is going to be a lot less intensive than, say, the bayesian analysis of SpamAssassin.

Also, how would you set this up? Done before delivery to mailboxes, or leave it up to the users and let them set it up in their procmailrc or similar?

mail-filter/clamassassin has a USE flag for using clamd that would be perfect for the latter. It provides a spamassassin-like interface for clamav. It’s possible to call clamdscan from procmailrc and use it that way, but it’s a bit of a pain.

]]> Comment on K-State … I’m baaaack! by ramereth http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/05/02/k-state-im-baaaack/#comment-14 ramereth Tue, 03 May 2005 12:29:15 +0000 http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/05/02/k-state-im-baaaack/#comment-14 joe: Haha! that will be a while I can imagine, but they did seem interested in possibly getting a mirror up at some point. solar: Thanks! Eh, I may still help my current boss on the side with it. It would be nice to get their stuff moved off of IIS and onto apache :) joe: Haha! that will be a while I can imagine, but they did seem interested in possibly getting a mirror up at some point.

solar: Thanks! Eh, I may still help my current boss on the side with it. It would be nice to get their stuff moved off of IIS and onto apache :)

]]> Comment on K-State … I’m baaaack! by solar http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/05/02/k-state-im-baaaack/#comment-13 solar Tue, 03 May 2005 12:24:22 +0000 http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/05/02/k-state-im-baaaack/#comment-13 best of luck. I guess this means you wont have to fight with mono anymore :) best of luck. I guess this means you wont have to fight with mono anymore :)

]]> Comment on K-State … I’m baaaack! by jrinkovs http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/05/02/k-state-im-baaaack/#comment-12 jrinkovs Tue, 03 May 2005 02:17:32 +0000 http://blog.ramereth.net/2005/05/02/k-state-im-baaaack/#comment-12 Congrats!!! When can we expect gentoo.ksu.edu to be online? Congrats!!! When can we expect gentoo.ksu.edu to be online?

]]>